PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $33 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
✅Delivers 9.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.5 vs 47.2 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Xeon E-2378.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2378 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (6,243 vs 9,986).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.

Xeon E-2378

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.2 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($362 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

2018

Xeon E-2378

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $33 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
✅Delivers 9.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.5 vs 47.2 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Xeon E-2378.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2378 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (6,243 vs 9,986).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.2 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($362 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2378 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E-2378 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E-2378 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 25.6% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2378 is the better fit. You are getting 60% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2378 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon E-2378 is 10.0% more expensive on MSRP at $362 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you a 25.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is also 9.3% better value on MSRP (51.5 vs 47.2 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2378 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2018), more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Benchmark Check

Xeon E-2378 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon E-2378
1080p
low	223 FPS	287 FPS
medium	191 FPS	257 FPS
high	156 FPS	218 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	187 FPS
1440p
low	183 FPS	235 FPS
medium	150 FPS	189 FPS
high	119 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	137 FPS
4K
low	71 FPS	164 FPS
medium	63 FPS	134 FPS
high	49 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	91 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Open Xeon E-2378

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon E-2378
1080p
low	346 FPS	427 FPS
medium	305 FPS	427 FPS
high	270 FPS	407 FPS
ultra	240 FPS	362 FPS
1440p
low	316 FPS	427 FPS
medium	285 FPS	412 FPS
high	250 FPS	359 FPS
ultra	218 FPS	309 FPS
4K
low	232 FPS	351 FPS
medium	213 FPS	294 FPS
high	195 FPS	272 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	235 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Open Xeon E-2378

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon E-2378
1080p
low	424 FPS	427 FPS
medium	424 FPS	427 FPS
high	424 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	427 FPS
1440p
low	424 FPS	427 FPS
medium	424 FPS	427 FPS
high	405 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	340 FPS	427 FPS
4K
low	391 FPS	427 FPS
medium	323 FPS	427 FPS
high	284 FPS	399 FPS
ultra	228 FPS	332 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Open Xeon E-2378

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon E-2378
1080p
low	424 FPS	427 FPS
medium	424 FPS	427 FPS
high	424 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	427 FPS
1440p
low	424 FPS	427 FPS
medium	424 FPS	427 FPS
high	424 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	427 FPS
4K
low	424 FPS	427 FPS
medium	424 FPS	427 FPS
high	413 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	359 FPS	427 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Open Xeon E-2378

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and Xeon E-2378

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,959 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E-2378

The Xeon E-2378 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 17,069 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and Xeon E-2378 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2378 — a 15.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2378 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E-2378 uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X scores 16,959 against the Xeon E-2378's 17,069 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E-2378. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,255 vs 1,821, a 36.8% lead for the Xeon E-2378 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,243 vs 9,986 (46.1% advantage for the Xeon E-2378). Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon E-2378
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	4.8 GHz+17%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+38%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	12 nm-14%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	Rocket Lake-E (2021)
PassMark	16,959	17,069
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,255	1,821+45%
Geekbench 6 Multi	6,243	9,986+60%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E-2378 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: X470,B450,X370,B350,A320 (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X) and C252,C256 (Xeon E-2378).

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon E-2378
Socket	AM4	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon E-2378 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X) vs Yes (Xeon E-2378). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X targets Workstation.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon E-2378
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	Yes
Target Use	Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon E-2378 debuted at $362. On MSRP ($329 vs $362), the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is $33 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X delivers 51.5 pts/$ vs 47.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E-2378 — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X the 8.9% better value option.