Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs Xeon D-1848TER

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Xeon D-1848TER.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1848TER, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon D-1848TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌84.2% higher power demand at 105W vs 57W.

Xeon D-1848TER

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
✅Draws 57W instead of 105W, a 48W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (16,952 vs 16,959).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

2018

Xeon D-1848TER

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Xeon D-1848TER.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
✅Draws 57W instead of 105W, a 48W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1848TER, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon D-1848TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌84.2% higher power demand at 105W vs 57W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (16,952 vs 16,959).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X better than Xeon D-1848TER?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon D-1848TER makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 19.4% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is the better fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is at an unclear MSRP at $329 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 19.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (51.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1848TER is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Benchmark Check

Xeon D-1848TER Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon D-1848TER
1080p
low	223 FPS	177 FPS
medium	191 FPS	144 FPS
high	156 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	183 FPS	143 FPS
medium	150 FPS	114 FPS
high	119 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	71 FPS	68 FPS
medium	63 FPS	57 FPS
high	49 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	36 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Open Xeon D-1848TER

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon D-1848TER
1080p
low	346 FPS	141 FPS
medium	305 FPS	124 FPS
high	270 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	240 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	316 FPS	124 FPS
medium	285 FPS	112 FPS
high	250 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	218 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	232 FPS	91 FPS
medium	213 FPS	84 FPS
high	195 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	58 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Open Xeon D-1848TER

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon D-1848TER
1080p
low	424 FPS	424 FPS
medium	424 FPS	424 FPS
high	424 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	398 FPS
1440p
low	424 FPS	424 FPS
medium	424 FPS	424 FPS
high	405 FPS	376 FPS
ultra	340 FPS	328 FPS
4K
low	391 FPS	404 FPS
medium	323 FPS	313 FPS
high	284 FPS	266 FPS
ultra	228 FPS	214 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Open Xeon D-1848TER

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon D-1848TER
1080p
low	424 FPS	424 FPS
medium	424 FPS	424 FPS
high	424 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	424 FPS
1440p
low	424 FPS	424 FPS
medium	424 FPS	424 FPS
high	424 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	418 FPS
4K
low	424 FPS	424 FPS
medium	424 FPS	401 FPS
high	413 FPS	357 FPS
ultra	359 FPS	308 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Open Xeon D-1848TER

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and Xeon D-1848TER

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,959 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-1848TER

The Xeon D-1848TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 57 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,952 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-1848TER offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon D-1848TER has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1848TER — a 27.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is built on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X scores 16,959 against the Xeon D-1848TER's 16,952 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X vs 15360 kB on the Xeon D-1848TER.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon D-1848TER
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+32%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+80%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)+7%	15360 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	12 nm	—
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	—
PassMark	16,959	16,952
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,255	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	6,243	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1848TER uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X	Xeon D-1848TER
Socket	AM4	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—