
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($209 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.3 vs 51.3 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,316 vs 15,342).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.3 vs 73.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
2020Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($209 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.3 vs 51.3 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,316 vs 15,342).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.3 vs 73.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 better than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 168 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 332 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700


Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,316 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,342 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE scores 15,316 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700's 15,342 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+2% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+3% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-42% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir (2020−2023) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 15,316 | 15,342 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE launched at $209 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 debuted at $299. On MSRP ($209 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE is $90 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE delivers 73.3 pts/$ vs 51.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE the 35.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $209-30% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.3+43% | 51.3 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












