
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-4667 v3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,316 vs 15,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 40 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.3 vs 120.3 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
Xeon E5-4667 v3
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ✅Costs $81 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 64.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.3 vs 73.3 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
2020Xeon E5-4667 v3
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ✅Costs $81 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 64.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.3 vs 73.3 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,316 vs 15,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 40 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.3 vs 120.3 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE better than Xeon E5-4667 v3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon E5-4667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon E5-4667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 74 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon E5-4667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 270 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon E5-4667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 358 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE and Xeon E5-4667 v3


Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,316 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4667 v3
Xeon E5-4667 v3
The Xeon E5-4667 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,397 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v3 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v3 — a 36.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE scores 15,316 against the Xeon E5-4667 v3's 15,397 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-4667 v3. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE vs 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4667 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon E5-4667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+45% | 2.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+65% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 40 MB (total)+400% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir (2020−2023) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 15,316 | 15,397 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon E5-4667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE launched at $209 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 debuted at $128. On MSRP ($209 vs $128), the Xeon E5-4667 v3 is $81 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE delivers 73.3 pts/$ vs 120.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4667 v3 — making the Xeon E5-4667 v3 the 48.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon E5-4667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $209 | $128-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.3 | 120.3+64% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












