
Ryzen 5 7533HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7533HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,231 vs 15,342).
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7533HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7533HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7533HS
2024Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,231 vs 15,342).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7533HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7533HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 better than Ryzen 5 7533HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7533HS | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7533HS | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 244 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 168 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7533HS | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 361 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7533HS | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 332 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7533HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700


Ryzen 5 7533HS
Ryzen 5 7533HS
The Ryzen 5 7533HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Setembro 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 15,231 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,342 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7533HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7533HS versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7533HS (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 15,231 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700's 15,342 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7533HS | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+7% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+3% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 6 nm-50% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 15,231 | 15,342 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7533HS | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












