
Ryzen 5 7533HS
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-4660 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7533HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,231 vs 15,375).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4660 v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Xeon E5-4660 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7533HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7533HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7533HS
2024Xeon E5-4660 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,231 vs 15,375).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4660 v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7533HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7533HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7533HS better than Xeon E5-4660 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7533HS | Xeon E5-4660 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7533HS | Xeon E5-4660 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 244 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7533HS | Xeon E5-4660 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 361 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7533HS | Xeon E5-4660 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 353 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7533HS and Xeon E5-4660 v4


Ryzen 5 7533HS
Ryzen 5 7533HS
The Ryzen 5 7533HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Setembro 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 15,231 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4660 v4
Xeon E5-4660 v4
The Xeon E5-4660 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,375 points. Launch price was $4,727.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7533HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4660 v4 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-4660 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7533HS versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4660 v4 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7533HS (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-4660 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 15,231 against the Xeon E5-4660 v4's 15,375 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5-4660 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7533HS vs 40 MB on the Xeon E5-4660 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7533HS | Xeon E5-4660 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+47% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+50% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 40 MB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 4 MB+700% |
| Process | 6 nm-57% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 15,231 | 15,375 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4660 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7533HS | Xeon E5-4660 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












