Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Xeon E5-4667 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 7533HS

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (15,231 vs 15,397).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Xeon E5-4667 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7533HS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $128 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7533HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7533HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Ryzen 5 7533HS

2024

Xeon E5-4667 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (15,231 vs 15,397).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7533HS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $128 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7533HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7533HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 7533HS better than Xeon E5-4667 v3?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-4667 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7533HS is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4667 v3 is the better fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 7533HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-4667 v3 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 5 7533HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $128 MSRP, and it gives you a 12.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon E5-4667 v3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.1% better PassMark. Xeon E5-4667 v3 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (120.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7533HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2015) and a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 7533HS Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-4667 v3 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7533HS	Xeon E5-4667 v3
1080p
low	164 FPS	175 FPS
medium	142 FPS	151 FPS
high	115 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	97 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	139 FPS	147 FPS
medium	119 FPS	123 FPS
high	96 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	76 FPS	68 FPS
medium	70 FPS	61 FPS
high	55 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	38 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7533HS Open Xeon E5-4667 v3

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7533HS	Xeon E5-4667 v3
1080p
low	326 FPS	212 FPS
medium	272 FPS	193 FPS
high	244 FPS	164 FPS
ultra	212 FPS	132 FPS
1440p
low	287 FPS	183 FPS
medium	244 FPS	166 FPS
high	224 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	191 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	222 FPS	115 FPS
medium	192 FPS	106 FPS
high	175 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	74 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7533HS Open Xeon E5-4667 v3

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 7533HS	Xeon E5-4667 v3
1080p
low	381 FPS	385 FPS
medium	381 FPS	385 FPS
high	381 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	381 FPS	385 FPS
1440p
low	381 FPS	385 FPS
medium	381 FPS	385 FPS
high	381 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	336 FPS	385 FPS
4K
low	361 FPS	385 FPS
medium	300 FPS	359 FPS
high	264 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	270 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7533HS Open Xeon E5-4667 v3

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 7533HS	Xeon E5-4667 v3
1080p
low	381 FPS	385 FPS
medium	381 FPS	385 FPS
high	381 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	381 FPS	385 FPS
1440p
low	381 FPS	385 FPS
medium	381 FPS	385 FPS
high	381 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	381 FPS	385 FPS
4K
low	381 FPS	385 FPS
medium	381 FPS	385 FPS
high	381 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	353 FPS	358 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7533HS Open Xeon E5-4667 v3

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7533HS and Xeon E5-4667 v3

Ryzen 5 7533HS

The Ryzen 5 7533HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Setembro 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 15,231 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4667 v3

The Xeon E5-4667 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,397 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 7533HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v3 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7533HS versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v3 — a 41.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7533HS (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 15,231 against the Xeon E5-4667 v3's 15,397 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E5-4667 v3. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7533HS vs 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4667 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7533HS	Xeon E5-4667 v3
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+52%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+65%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	40 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	6 nm-73%	22 nm
Architecture	Rembrandt-R (2023−2025)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	15,231	15,397+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.