
Ryzen 7 7735H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 8840U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7735H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 7 8840U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8840U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
Ryzen 7 8840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,415 vs 23,619).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7735H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7735H
2023Ryzen 7 8840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 7 8840U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8840U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,415 vs 23,619).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7735H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7735H better than Ryzen 7 8840U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 230 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 350 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 202 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 585 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 585 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 585 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 585 FPS |
| medium | 505 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 521 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 321 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 345 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 585 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 585 FPS |
| ultra | 590 FPS | 585 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 585 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 587 FPS | 585 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 7 8840U


Ryzen 7 7735H
Ryzen 7 7735H
The Ryzen 7 7735H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 23,619 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 8840U
Ryzen 7 8840U
The Ryzen 7 8840U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,415 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 7 8840U share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7735H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840U — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8840U (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7735H uses the Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) architecture (6 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8840U uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7735H scores 23,619 against the Ryzen 7 8840U's 23,415 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 7735H. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.75 GHz | 5.1 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm-33% |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 23,619 | 23,415 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7735H uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 8840U uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7735H) / not specified (Ryzen 7 8840U). The Ryzen 7 7735H includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Ryzen 7 8840U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7735H targets Mobile.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 680M | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











