PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 8840HX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+52.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 42 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 205W, a 150W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 780M, while Xeon Gold 6330 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6330, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Gold 6330

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8840HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (42,072 vs 42,275).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (42 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,128 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌272.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 55W.

Ryzen 7 8840HX

2025

Xeon Gold 6330

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+52.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 42 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 205W, a 150W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 780M, while Xeon Gold 6330 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6330, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8840HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (42,072 vs 42,275).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (42 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,128 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌272.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8840HX better than Xeon Gold 6330?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Gold 6330 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 8840HX is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 8840HX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 22.1% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 8840HX is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 52.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 42 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 8840HX is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 6330 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 8840HX is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,128 MSRP, and it gives you a 22.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Gold 6330 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 8840HX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2021), a healthier platform with FL1 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, 52.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 42 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 28/56. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 8840HX Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6330 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 8840HX	Xeon Gold 6330
1080p
low	267 FPS	183 FPS
medium	244 FPS	146 FPS
high	207 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	180 FPS	92 FPS
1440p
low	252 FPS	152 FPS
medium	206 FPS	118 FPS
high	162 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	146 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	175 FPS	71 FPS
medium	143 FPS	59 FPS
high	107 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	37 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 8840HX Open Xeon Gold 6330

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 8840HX	Xeon Gold 6330
1080p
low	654 FPS	232 FPS
medium	566 FPS	208 FPS
high	427 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	367 FPS	139 FPS
1440p
low	554 FPS	199 FPS
medium	494 FPS	180 FPS
high	384 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	303 FPS	119 FPS
4K
low	312 FPS	124 FPS
medium	283 FPS	114 FPS
high	250 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	212 FPS	81 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 8840HX Open Xeon Gold 6330

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 8840HX	Xeon Gold 6330
1080p
low	847 FPS	935 FPS
medium	677 FPS	817 FPS
high	599 FPS	766 FPS
ultra	514 FPS	680 FPS
1440p
low	676 FPS	746 FPS
medium	541 FPS	643 FPS
high	468 FPS	603 FPS
ultra	397 FPS	535 FPS
4K
low	483 FPS	479 FPS
medium	400 FPS	378 FPS
high	360 FPS	334 FPS
ultra	302 FPS	272 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 8840HX Open Xeon Gold 6330

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 8840HX	Xeon Gold 6330
1080p
low	1057 FPS	881 FPS
medium	966 FPS	793 FPS
high	843 FPS	681 FPS
ultra	760 FPS	581 FPS
1440p
low	842 FPS	691 FPS
medium	747 FPS	604 FPS
high	652 FPS	517 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	438 FPS
4K
low	619 FPS	498 FPS
medium	553 FPS	444 FPS
high	487 FPS	389 FPS
ultra	421 FPS	334 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 8840HX Open Xeon Gold 6330

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 8840HX and Xeon Gold 6330

Ryzen 7 8840HX

The Ryzen 7 8840HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 April 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 42,275 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Gold 6330

The Xeon Gold 6330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 42 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 42,072 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 8840HX packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6330 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 6330 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HX versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6330 — a 48.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8840HX (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8840HX uses the Dragon Range (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6330 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 8840HX scores 42,275 against the Xeon Gold 6330's 42,072 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 8840HX. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840HX vs 42 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6330.

Feature	Ryzen 7 8840HX	Xeon Gold 6330
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	28 / 56+133%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+65%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+45%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+52%	42 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Dragon Range (2025)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	42,275	42,072

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 8840HX uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6330 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Ryzen 7 8840HX versus 2933 on the Xeon Gold 6330 — the Ryzen 7 8840HX supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6330 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 64 — 195.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 8840HX) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6330). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 7 8840HX) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6330) — the Xeon Gold 6330 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 7 8840HX) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6330).

Feature	Ryzen 7 8840HX	Xeon Gold 6330
Socket	FL1	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	5600+91%	2933
Max RAM Capacity	64	6144+9500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	64+129%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8840HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6330). The Ryzen 7 8840HX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 780M), while the Xeon Gold 6330 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8840HX rivals Core i7-13700H; Xeon Gold 6330 rivals EPYC 7453.