
Ryzen 7 7840U
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6143
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 205W, a 177W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,547 vs 24,786).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6143, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.4 vs 72.5 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $342 MSRP).
Xeon Gold 6143
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ✅Costs $58 less on MSRP ($342 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 72.5 vs 61.4 PassMark/$ ($342 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌632.1% higher power demand at 205W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840U moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 7840U
2023Xeon Gold 6143
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 205W, a 177W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ✅Costs $58 less on MSRP ($342 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 72.5 vs 61.4 PassMark/$ ($342 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,547 vs 24,786).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6143, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.4 vs 72.5 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $342 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌632.1% higher power demand at 205W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840U moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7840U better than Xeon Gold 6143?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7840U | Xeon Gold 6143 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7840U | Xeon Gold 6143 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 395 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 342 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 344 FPS |
| medium | 364 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 315 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 144 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7840U | Xeon Gold 6143 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| medium | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| ultra | 595 FPS | 620 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| medium | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| high | 526 FPS | 620 FPS |
| ultra | 452 FPS | 589 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 459 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7840U | Xeon Gold 6143 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| medium | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| ultra | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| medium | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 549 FPS | 519 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 587 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 453 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 380 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7840U and Xeon Gold 6143


Ryzen 7 7840U
Ryzen 7 7840U
The Ryzen 7 7840U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 24,547 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6143
Xeon Gold 6143
The Xeon Gold 6143 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,786 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 7840U packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6143 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6143 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840U versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6143 — a 24.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840U (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7840U is built on the Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7840U scores 24,547 against the Xeon Gold 6143's 24,786 — a 1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6143. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840U vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6143.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840U | Xeon Gold 6143 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+27% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+18% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 22 MB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) | — |
| PassMark | 24,547 | 24,786 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7840U uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6143 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840U | Xeon Gold 6143 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 7840U launched at $400 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6143 debuted at $342. On MSRP ($400 vs $342), the Xeon Gold 6143 is $58 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 7840U delivers 61.4 pts/$ vs 72.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6143 — making the Xeon Gold 6143 the 16.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840U | Xeon Gold 6143 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400 | $342-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.4 | 72.5+18% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











