
Ryzen 7 7735H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7840S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7735H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840S across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌337.5% higher power demand at 35W vs 8W.
Ryzen 7 7840S
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 35W, a 27W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,290 vs 23,619).
Ryzen 7 7735H
2023Ryzen 7 7840S
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 35W, a 27W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840S across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌337.5% higher power demand at 35W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,290 vs 23,619).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7735H better than Ryzen 7 7840S?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 230 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 350 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 216 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 582 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 505 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 321 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 582 FPS |
| ultra | 590 FPS | 582 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 587 FPS | 582 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 7 7840S


Ryzen 7 7735H
Ryzen 7 7735H
The Ryzen 7 7735H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 23,619 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 7840S
Ryzen 7 7840S
The Ryzen 7 7840S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,290 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 7 7840S share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7735H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840S — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840S (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7735H uses the Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) architecture (6 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840S uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7735H scores 23,619 against the Ryzen 7 7840S's 23,290 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 7735H. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7735H vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 7840S.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.75 GHz | 5.1 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm-33% |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 23,619+1% | 23,290 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 13,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,570 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 13,535 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7735H uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840S uses FP7/FP7r2/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 7840S supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-5600, LPDDR5x-7500 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 256 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 7840S supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7735H) vs AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 7840S). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 680M (Ryzen 7 7735H) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 7840S) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7735H targets Mobile, Ryzen 7 7840S targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7840S rivals Core i7-1360P.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735H | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 680M | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | Mobile | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











