
EPYC 4364P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4364P
2024Why buy it
- ✅+13.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 85.8 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 120W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (32 MB vs 96 MB).
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 96 MB vs 32 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 21,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 76.4 vs 85.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
EPYC 4364P
2024Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅+13.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 85.8 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 120W, a 15W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 96 MB vs 32 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (32 MB vs 96 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 21,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 76.4 vs 85.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4364P better than Ryzen 7 7800X3D?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 705 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 735 FPS |
| high | 464 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 412 FPS | 491 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 715 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 607 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 271 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 855 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 855 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 855 FPS | 857 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 855 FPS | 851 FPS |
| high | 790 FPS | 786 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 362 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 855 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 855 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 852 FPS | 782 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 855 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 669 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 682 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 600 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 531 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 428 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 7 7800X3D

EPYC 4364P
EPYC 4364P
The EPYC 4364P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $399.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 7 7800X3D share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4364P versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 7.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4364P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 4364P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4364P scores 34,215 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 18,500 (12.7% advantage for the EPYC 4364P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,085 vs 2,700, a 13.3% lead for the EPYC 4364P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,594 vs 15,000 (3.9% advantage for the EPYC 4364P). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4364P vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+8% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz+2% | 4.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 34,215 | 34,293 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000+14% | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,085+14% | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,594+4% | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The EPYC 4364P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4364P) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4364P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4364P) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4364P targets Entry Server, Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 4364P rivals Xeon E-2488; Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Entry Server | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4364P launched at $399 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D debuted at $449. On MSRP ($399 vs $449), the EPYC 4364P is $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4364P delivers 85.8 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the EPYC 4364P the 11.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-11% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 85.8+12% | 76.4 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












