
EPYC 4364P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4364P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,215 vs 34,827).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 7745.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 4364P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4364P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4364P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌0.3% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
EPYC 4364P
2024Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 4364P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,215 vs 34,827).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 7745.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4364P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4364P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌0.3% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 better than EPYC 4364P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 710 FPS | 616 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 597 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 417 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 331 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 228 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 871 FPS |
| medium | 855 FPS | 871 FPS |
| high | 855 FPS | 871 FPS |
| ultra | 855 FPS | 871 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 871 FPS |
| medium | 855 FPS | 870 FPS |
| high | 790 FPS | 788 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 379 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 871 FPS |
| medium | 855 FPS | 871 FPS |
| high | 855 FPS | 871 FPS |
| ultra | 852 FPS | 847 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 871 FPS |
| medium | 855 FPS | 871 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 765 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 646 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 682 FPS | 680 FPS |
| medium | 600 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 531 FPS | 530 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

EPYC 4364P
EPYC 4364P
The EPYC 4364P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $399.


Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,827 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4364P versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 — a 1.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 4364P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). Both are built on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture using a 5 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 4364P scores 34,215 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745's 34,827 — a 1.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745. Both processors carry 32 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+2% | 5.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz+18% | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 34,215 | 34,827+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,085 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,594 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4364P versus 5200 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 — the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4364P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4364P) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745) — the EPYC 4364P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4364P) and AM5 (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745).
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | 5200+103900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+157286300% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+17% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4364P) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4364P) and AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4364P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4364P rivals Xeon E-2488; Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 rivals Core i7-13700.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | AMD-V, IOMMU |
| Target Use | Entry Server | — |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4364P launched at $399 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 debuted at $400. On MSRP ($399 vs $400), the EPYC 4364P is $1 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4364P delivers 85.8 pts/$ vs 87.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 the 1.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 85.8 | 87.1+2% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












