EPYC 4364P vs Ryzen 7 7700

AMD

EPYC 4364P

8 Cores16 Thrd105 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 7700

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 4364P

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +21.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (34,215 vs 34,392).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 85.8 vs 104.5 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • 61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 7700

2023

Why buy it

  • +0.5% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $70 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 21.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 104.5 vs 85.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4364P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7700 better than EPYC 4364P?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 4364P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 7700 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7700 is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 7700 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 7700 is $70 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and it gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The trade-off is that EPYC 4364P is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 21.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 21.9% better value on MSRP (104.5 vs 85.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4364P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 4364PRyzen 7 7700
1080p
low249 FPS263 FPS
medium232 FPS243 FPS
high201 FPS208 FPS
ultra173 FPS178 FPS
1440p
low218 FPS225 FPS
medium183 FPS188 FPS
high152 FPS153 FPS
ultra134 FPS134 FPS
4K
low152 FPS156 FPS
medium127 FPS131 FPS
high99 FPS101 FPS
ultra86 FPS87 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 4364PRyzen 7 7700
1080p
low705 FPS630 FPS
medium564 FPS519 FPS
high464 FPS429 FPS
ultra412 FPS388 FPS
1440p
low591 FPS537 FPS
medium497 FPS464 FPS
high415 FPS390 FPS
ultra349 FPS333 FPS
4K
low345 FPS315 FPS
medium296 FPS277 FPS
high277 FPS261 FPS
ultra240 FPS229 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 4364PRyzen 7 7700
1080p
low855 FPS860 FPS
medium855 FPS744 FPS
high855 FPS650 FPS
ultra855 FPS558 FPS
1440p
low855 FPS734 FPS
medium855 FPS589 FPS
high790 FPS505 FPS
ultra656 FPS430 FPS
4K
low582 FPS507 FPS
medium500 FPS420 FPS
high450 FPS377 FPS
ultra380 FPS317 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 4364PRyzen 7 7700
1080p
low855 FPS860 FPS
medium855 FPS860 FPS
high855 FPS850 FPS
ultra852 FPS756 FPS
1440p
low855 FPS860 FPS
medium855 FPS773 FPS
high766 FPS678 FPS
ultra647 FPS584 FPS
4K
low682 FPS581 FPS
medium600 FPS517 FPS
high531 FPS466 FPS
ultra437 FPS405 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 7 7700

AMD

EPYC 4364P

The EPYC 4364P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Ryzen 7 7700

The Ryzen 7 7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,392 points. Launch price was $339.

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 7 7700 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4364P versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7700 — a 1.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 4364P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 4364P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7700 uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4364P scores 34,215 against the Ryzen 7 7700's 34,392 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 7700. Both processors carry 32 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureEPYC 4364PRyzen 7 7700
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+2%
5.3 GHz
Base Clock
4.5 GHz+18%
3.8 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)
32 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm
5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture
Raphael (2023−2025)
Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark
34,215
34,392
Cinebench R23 Multi
21,000
Geekbench 6 Single
3,085
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,594
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the AM5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The EPYC 4364P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 28 PCIe lanes.

FeatureEPYC 4364PRyzen 7 7700
Socket
AM5
AM5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200
DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+50%
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 7700 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4364P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7700). Both include integrated graphics Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4364P) and Radeon Graphics (2CU) (Ryzen 7 7700) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4364P targets Entry Server, Ryzen 7 7700 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 4364P rivals Xeon E-2488.

FeatureEPYC 4364PRyzen 7 7700
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics (2CU)
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
AMD-V
Target Use
Entry Server
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 4364P launched at $399 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7700 debuted at $329. On MSRP ($399 vs $329), the Ryzen 7 7700 is $70 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4364P delivers 85.8 pts/$ vs 104.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7700 — making the Ryzen 7 7700 the 19.7% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 4364PRyzen 7 7700
MSRP
$399
$329-18%
Performance per Dollar
85.8
104.5+22%
Release Date
2024
2023