
EPYC 4364P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4364P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,215 vs 34,392).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 85.8 vs 104.5 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 7700
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 104.5 vs 85.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4364P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
EPYC 4364P
2024Ryzen 7 7700
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 104.5 vs 85.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,215 vs 34,392).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 85.8 vs 104.5 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4364P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7700 better than EPYC 4364P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 705 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 519 FPS |
| high | 464 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 412 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 537 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 860 FPS |
| medium | 855 FPS | 744 FPS |
| high | 855 FPS | 650 FPS |
| ultra | 855 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 855 FPS | 589 FPS |
| high | 790 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 317 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 860 FPS |
| medium | 855 FPS | 860 FPS |
| high | 855 FPS | 850 FPS |
| ultra | 852 FPS | 756 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 860 FPS |
| medium | 855 FPS | 773 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 678 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 584 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 682 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 600 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 531 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 405 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 7 7700

EPYC 4364P
EPYC 4364P
The EPYC 4364P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $399.


Ryzen 7 7700
Ryzen 7 7700
The Ryzen 7 7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,392 points. Launch price was $339.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 7 7700 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4364P versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7700 — a 1.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 4364P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 4364P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7700 uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4364P scores 34,215 against the Ryzen 7 7700's 34,392 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 7700. Both processors carry 32 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+2% | 5.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz+18% | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 34,215 | 34,392 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,085 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,594 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The EPYC 4364P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 28 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 7700 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4364P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7700). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4364P) and Radeon Graphics (2CU) (Ryzen 7 7700) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4364P targets Entry Server, Ryzen 7 7700 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 4364P rivals Xeon E-2488.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | Radeon Graphics (2CU) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Entry Server | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4364P launched at $399 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7700 debuted at $329. On MSRP ($399 vs $329), the Ryzen 7 7700 is $70 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4364P delivers 85.8 pts/$ vs 104.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7700 — making the Ryzen 7 7700 the 19.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 7 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $329-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 85.8 | 104.5+22% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












