
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Popular choices:

Xeon D-2795NT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +43.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 110W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (28,298 vs 28,463).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2795NT, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Xeon D-2795NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon D-2795NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
2022Xeon D-2795NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +43.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 110W, a 5W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (28,298 vs 28,463).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2795NT, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Xeon D-2795NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X3D better than Xeon D-2795NT?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X3D | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X3D | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 570 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 429 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 78 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X3D | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 607 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 566 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 498 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 568 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 363 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 410 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 230 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X3D | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 707 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 707 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 707 FPS | 642 FPS |
| ultra | 707 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 707 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 707 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 703 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 625 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 531 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 309 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800X3D and Xeon D-2795NT


Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
The Ryzen 7 5800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,298 points. Launch price was $449.

Xeon D-2795NT
Xeon D-2795NT
The Xeon D-2795NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,463 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5800X3D packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-2795NT offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon D-2795NT has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X3D versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2795NT — a 36.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X3D (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800X3D is built on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800X3D scores 28,298 against the Xeon D-2795NT's 28,463 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon D-2795NT. L3 cache: 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs 30 MB on the Xeon D-2795NT.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X3D | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+45% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+70% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 96 MB (total)+220% | 30 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | — |
| PassMark | 28,298 | 28,463 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 15,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,962 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5800X3D uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2795NT uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon D-2795NT supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5800X3D) vs 4 (Xeon D-2795NT). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X3D) vs 32 (Xeon D-2795NT) — the Xeon D-2795NT offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series (Ryzen 7 5800X3D) and SoC platform (Xeon D-2795NT).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X3D | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA2579 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1024 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 32+33% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 5800X3D) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon D-2795NT). Primary use case: Xeon D-2795NT targets Networking / Edge Computing / SoC. Direct competitor: Xeon D-2795NT rivals EPYC 7302.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X3D | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Networking / Edge Computing / SoC |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












