
Ryzen 7 5700U
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2660 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700U
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8 CUs), while Xeon E5-2660 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,511 vs 15,650).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 35 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2660 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
Xeon E5-2660 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+337.5% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 5700U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 5700U
2021Xeon E5-2660 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8 CUs), while Xeon E5-2660 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+337.5% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,511 vs 15,650).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 35 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2660 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 5700U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700U better than Xeon E5-2660 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700U | Xeon E5-2660 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700U | Xeon E5-2660 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700U | Xeon E5-2660 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 388 FPS | 391 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 388 FPS | 391 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 388 FPS | 391 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 279 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700U | Xeon E5-2660 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 388 FPS | 391 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 388 FPS | 391 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 388 FPS | 391 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 361 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700U and Xeon E5-2660 v4


Ryzen 7 5700U
Ryzen 7 5700U
The Ryzen 7 5700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Lucienne-U (Zen 2) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,511 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2660 v4
Xeon E5-2660 v4
The Xeon E5-2660 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 15,650 points. Launch price was $1,445.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700U packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2660 v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2660 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700U versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2660 v4 — a 29.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700U (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700U uses the Lucienne-U (Zen 2) (2021) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2660 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700U scores 15,511 against the Xeon E5-2660 v4's 15,650 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2660 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700U vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2660 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700U | Xeon E5-2660 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 14 / 28+75% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+34% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 35 MB+338% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 3.5 MB+600% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Lucienne-U (Zen 2) (2021) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 15,511 | 15,650 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,600 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,200 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2660 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700U | Xeon E5-2660 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4x-4267 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700U) / not specified (Xeon E5-2660 v4). The Ryzen 7 5700U includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (8 CUs)), while the Xeon E5-2660 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700U targets Mainstream Laptop.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700U | Xeon E5-2660 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics (8 CUs) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Mainstream Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












