
Ryzen 7 4980U
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2683 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 4980U
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 120W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 40 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2683 v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2683 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,459 vs 17,469).
- ❌700% higher power demand at 120W vs 15W.
Ryzen 7 4980U
2021Xeon E5-2683 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 120W, a 105W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 40 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2683 v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,459 vs 17,469).
- ❌700% higher power demand at 120W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 4980U better than Xeon E5-2683 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 4980U | Xeon E5-2683 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 4980U | Xeon E5-2683 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 4980U | Xeon E5-2683 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 437 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 437 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 437 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 340 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 4980U | Xeon E5-2683 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 437 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 437 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 437 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 415 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 353 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 4980U and Xeon E5-2683 v4


Ryzen 7 4980U
Ryzen 7 4980U
The Ryzen 7 4980U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 April 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,469 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2683 v4
Xeon E5-2683 v4
The Xeon E5-2683 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,459 points. Launch price was $1,846.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 4980U packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2683 v4 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2683 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4980U versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2683 v4 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 4980U (base: 2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 4980U uses the Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2683 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 4980U scores 17,469 against the Xeon E5-2683 v4's 17,459 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 4980U. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 4980U vs 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2683 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 4980U | Xeon E5-2683 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+47% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.1 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 40 MB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 4 MB+700% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 17,469 | 17,459 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 4980U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2683 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 4980U | Xeon E5-2683 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1536 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












