
Ryzen 7 4800U
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6134
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 4800U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6134 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,427 vs 16,519).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6134, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 6134
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+209.4% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,214 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 4800U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.
Ryzen 7 4800U
2020Xeon Gold 6134
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+209.4% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6134 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,427 vs 16,519).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6134, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,214 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 4800U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6134 better than Ryzen 7 4800U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 4800U | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 4800U | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 148 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 4800U | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 411 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 411 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 411 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 372 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 267 FPS | 267 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 4800U | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 411 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 411 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 411 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 390 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 340 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 285 FPS | 351 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 4800U and Xeon Gold 6134


Ryzen 7 4800U
Ryzen 7 4800U
The Ryzen 7 4800U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,427 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6134
Xeon Gold 6134
The Xeon Gold 6134 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,519 points. Launch price was $2,214.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 4800U and Xeon Gold 6134 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4800U versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6134 — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 4800U (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 4800U uses the Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 4800U scores 16,427 against the Xeon Gold 6134's 16,519 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 6134. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 4800U vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6134.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 4800U | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+14% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz+78% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 24.75 MB+209% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 16,427 | 16,519 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 4800U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 4800U | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 4800U) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6134).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 4800U | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











