
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
Popular choices:

Xeon D-2775TE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2775TE, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $229 MSRP, while Xeon D-2775TE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon D-2775TE
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,299 vs 27,565).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
2023Xeon D-2775TE
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2775TE, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $229 MSRP, while Xeon D-2775TE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,299 vs 27,565).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 better than Xeon D-2775TE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Xeon D-2775TE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Xeon D-2775TE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 451 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 75 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Xeon D-2775TE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 682 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 581 FPS |
| high | 689 FPS | 504 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 587 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 689 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 621 FPS | 362 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 341 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Xeon D-2775TE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 682 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 682 FPS |
| high | 689 FPS | 642 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 659 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 689 FPS | 492 FPS |
| ultra | 645 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 675 FPS | 450 FPS |
| medium | 594 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 526 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 309 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 and Xeon D-2775TE


Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,565 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-2775TE
Xeon D-2775TE
The Xeon D-2775TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,299 points. Launch price was $1,751.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-2775TE offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon D-2775TE has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2775TE — a 48.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon D-2775TE uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 scores 27,565 against the Xeon D-2775TE's 27,299 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2775TE.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Xeon D-2775TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+65% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+90% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+28% | 25 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% |
| Process | 5 nm-50% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 27,565 | 27,299 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2775TE uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 | Xeon D-2775TE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FCBGA2579 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











