
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4116T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 85W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 17 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4116T, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4116T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Silver 4116T
2017Why buy it
- ✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,187 vs 15,316).
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 35W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
2020Xeon Silver 4116T
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 85W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 17 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4116T, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4116T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,187 vs 15,316).
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE better than Xeon Silver 4116T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon Silver 4116T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon Silver 4116T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon Silver 4116T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 380 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 318 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 207 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon Silver 4116T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 380 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 380 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 306 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE and Xeon Silver 4116T


Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,316 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Silver 4116T
Xeon Silver 4116T
The Xeon Silver 4116T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 15,187 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4116T offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Silver 4116T has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4116T — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4116T uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE scores 15,316 against the Xeon Silver 4116T's 15,187 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon Silver 4116T.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon Silver 4116T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+40% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+57% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 16.5 MB+106% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 12 MB+2300% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir (2020−2023) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 15,316 | 15,187 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4116T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE | Xeon Silver 4116T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












