
Ryzen 5 7535H
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2695 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7535H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2695 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,832 vs 18,835).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
Xeon E5-2695 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7535H moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7535H
2023Xeon E5-2695 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2695 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,832 vs 18,835).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7535H moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2695 v4 better than Ryzen 5 7535H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7535H | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7535H | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 359 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 230 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 311 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 263 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 231 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7535H | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 306 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7535H | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 471 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 471 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 471 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 471 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 467 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 356 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7535H and Xeon E5-2695 v4


Ryzen 5 7535H
Ryzen 5 7535H
The Ryzen 5 7535H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.55 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 18,832 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2695 v4
Xeon E5-2695 v4
The Xeon E5-2695 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,835 points. Launch price was $2,424.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7535H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.55 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7535H versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2695 v4 — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7535H (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7535H uses the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7535H scores 18,832 against the Xeon E5-2695 v4's 18,835 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E5-2695 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7535H vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-2695 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7535H | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 18 / 36+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.55 GHz+38% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+57% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 45 MB+181% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 4.5 MB+800% |
| Process | 6 nm-57% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 18,832 | 18,835 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7535H uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7535H | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












