Ryzen 5 7535H vs Xeon E5-2682 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 7535H

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,832 vs 18,971).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2682 v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Xeon E5-2682 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on FCLGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7535H moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Ryzen 5 7535H

2023

Xeon E5-2682 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA2011 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,832 vs 18,971).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2682 v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on FCLGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7535H moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 7535H better than Xeon E5-2682 v4?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2682 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7535H is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2682 v4 is the better fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 7535H still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 5 7535H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 82% higher max boost clock.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7535H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA2011. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 7535H Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2682 v4 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7535H	Xeon E5-2682 v4
1080p
low	168 FPS	177 FPS
medium	146 FPS	152 FPS
high	119 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	141 FPS	149 FPS
medium	121 FPS	124 FPS
high	99 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	69 FPS
medium	71 FPS	61 FPS
high	56 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	38 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7535H Open Xeon E5-2682 v4

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7535H	Xeon E5-2682 v4
1080p
low	359 FPS	365 FPS
medium	299 FPS	331 FPS
high	264 FPS	279 FPS
ultra	230 FPS	225 FPS
1440p
low	311 FPS	314 FPS
medium	263 FPS	285 FPS
high	240 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	205 FPS	189 FPS
4K
low	231 FPS	195 FPS
medium	199 FPS	178 FPS
high	182 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	148 FPS	121 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7535H Open Xeon E5-2682 v4

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 7535H	Xeon E5-2682 v4
1080p
low	471 FPS	474 FPS
medium	471 FPS	474 FPS
high	467 FPS	458 FPS
ultra	397 FPS	410 FPS
1440p
low	471 FPS	474 FPS
medium	435 FPS	436 FPS
high	394 FPS	389 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	349 FPS
4K
low	369 FPS	400 FPS
medium	306 FPS	322 FPS
high	268 FPS	287 FPS
ultra	216 FPS	239 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7535H Open Xeon E5-2682 v4

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 7535H	Xeon E5-2682 v4
1080p
low	471 FPS	474 FPS
medium	471 FPS	474 FPS
high	471 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	471 FPS	474 FPS
1440p
low	471 FPS	474 FPS
medium	471 FPS	474 FPS
high	471 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	471 FPS	461 FPS
4K
low	471 FPS	474 FPS
medium	471 FPS	470 FPS
high	436 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	355 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7535H Open Xeon E5-2682 v4

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7535H and Xeon E5-2682 v4

Ryzen 5 7535H

The Ryzen 5 7535H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.55 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 18,832 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2682 v4

The Xeon E5-2682 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,971 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 7535H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2682 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.55 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7535H versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2682 v4 — a 58.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7535H. The Ryzen 5 7535H uses the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7535H scores 18,832 against the Xeon E5-2682 v4's 18,971 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2682 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7535H vs 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2682 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7535H	Xeon E5-2682 v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock	4.55 GHz+82%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	40 MB+150%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	4 MB+700%
Process	6 nm-57%	14 nm
Architecture	Rembrandt-R (2023−2025)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	18,832	18,971

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 7535H uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 uses FCLGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.