
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 43,174).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 moves to FP11 and DDR5.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌100.7% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 43,174).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 moves to FP11 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌100.7% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 97 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 656 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 654 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 572 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 264 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 1021 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 783 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 685 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 818 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 635 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 342 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 1079 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 912 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 811 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 788 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 689 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 605 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 43,174 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390's 43,174 — a 65.6% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+16% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 64 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 21,845 | 43,174+98% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 5600X) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) vs 28 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X) and Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 8000+199900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+104857500% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 28+17% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8050S), while the Ryzen 5 5600X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 rivals Apple M4 Max.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon 8050S |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 debuted at $600. On MSRP ($299 vs $600), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $301 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600X delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 72.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 1.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-50% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.1+2% | 72.0 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












