
Core i9-9920X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-9920X
2018Why buy it
- ✅+14.3% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($1,189 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $890 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 247.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 24,974).
Core i9-9920X
2018Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+14.3% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $890 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 247.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($1,189 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 24,974).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Core i9-9920X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-9920X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-9920X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 438 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 385 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-9920X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 624 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 547 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 499 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 577 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 364 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-9920X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 624 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 624 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 624 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 624 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 624 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 624 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 624 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 620 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 624 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 582 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 521 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-9920X and Ryzen 5 5600X

Core i9-9920X
Core i9-9920X
The Core i9-9920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,974 points. Launch price was $1,189.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-9920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-9920X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-9920X versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i9-9920X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9920X scores 24,974 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 13.4% lead for the Core i9-9920X. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-9920X vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i9-9920X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.6 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total) | 32 MB+66% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 24,974+14% | 21,845 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9920X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-9920X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-9920X) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-9920X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-9920X launched at $1189 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($1189 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $890 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9920X delivers 21.0 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 110.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-9920X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1189 | $299-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.0 | 73.1+248% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












