
Core i9-12900F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-12900F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌65.2% HIGHER MSRP$494 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $195 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 35,873).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-12900F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i9-12900F
2022Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $195 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌65.2% HIGHER MSRP$494 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 35,873).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-12900F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-12900F better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-12900F | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-12900F | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 397 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 340 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 311 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-12900F | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 619 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 560 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 418 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-12900F | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 894 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 809 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 696 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 681 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 586 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 517 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-12900F and Ryzen 5 5600X

Core i9-12900F
Core i9-12900F
The Core i9-12900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 35,873 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-12900F packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-12900F has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-12900F versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900F (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i9-12900F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900F scores 35,873 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 48.6% lead for the Core i9-12900F. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900F vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i9-12900F | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+167% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+11% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz+54% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 32 MB+7% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 35,873+64% | 21,845 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-12900F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i9-12900F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X — the Core i9-12900F supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-12900F) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) — the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i9-12900F) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X).
| Feature | Core i9-12900F | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+119900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 128 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-12900F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i9-12900F rivals Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | Core i9-12900F | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-12900F launched at $494 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($494 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $195 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-12900F delivers 72.6 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 0.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-12900F | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $494 | $299-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 72.6 | 73.1 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












