
Ryzen 5 5560U
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4116T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5560U
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 17 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4116T, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Xeon Silver 4116T
2017Why buy it
- ✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5560U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,187 vs 15,202).
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.
Ryzen 5 5560U
2021Xeon Silver 4116T
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 17 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4116T, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5560U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,187 vs 15,202).
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5560U better than Xeon Silver 4116T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5560U | Xeon Silver 4116T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5560U | Xeon Silver 4116T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5560U | Xeon Silver 4116T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 380 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 380 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 380 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 367 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 318 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 207 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5560U | Xeon Silver 4116T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 380 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 380 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 380 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 380 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 380 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 331 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 285 FPS | 306 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5560U and Xeon Silver 4116T


Ryzen 5 5560U
Ryzen 5 5560U
The Ryzen 5 5560U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 December 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-U (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 15,202 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Silver 4116T
Xeon Silver 4116T
The Xeon Silver 4116T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 15,187 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5560U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4116T offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Silver 4116T has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5560U versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4116T — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5560U (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5560U uses the Cezanne-U (Zen 3) (2021) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4116T uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5560U scores 15,202 against the Xeon Silver 4116T's 15,187 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 5560U. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen 5 5560U vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon Silver 4116T.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5560U | Xeon Silver 4116T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+33% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz+10% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 16.5 MB+106% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 12 MB+300% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cezanne-U (Zen 3) (2021) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 15,202 | 15,187 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5560U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4116T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5560U | Xeon Silver 4116T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











