
Ryzen 5 5560U
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-4610 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5560U
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4610 v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
Xeon E5-4610 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5560U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,084 vs 15,202).
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
Ryzen 5 5560U
2021Xeon E5-4610 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4610 v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5560U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,084 vs 15,202).
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5560U better than Xeon E5-4610 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5560U | Xeon E5-4610 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5560U | Xeon E5-4610 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 69 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5560U | Xeon E5-4610 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 380 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 377 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 380 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 367 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 377 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 279 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5560U | Xeon E5-4610 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 380 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 377 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 380 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 377 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 380 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 331 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 285 FPS | 301 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5560U and Xeon E5-4610 v4


Ryzen 5 5560U
Ryzen 5 5560U
The Ryzen 5 5560U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 December 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-U (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 15,202 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4610 v4
Xeon E5-4610 v4
The Xeon E5-4610 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,084 points. Launch price was $1,219.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5560U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4610 v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-4610 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5560U versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4610 v4 — a 75.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5560U (base: 2.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5560U uses the Cezanne-U (Zen 3) (2021) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4610 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5560U scores 15,202 against the Xeon E5-4610 v4's 15,084 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 5560U. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen 5 5560U vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-4610 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5560U | Xeon E5-4610 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+122% | 1.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz+28% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 25 MB+213% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+20% | 2.5 MB |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cezanne-U (Zen 3) (2021) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 15,202 | 15,084 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5560U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4610 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5560U | Xeon E5-4610 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











