
Ryzen 5 4600H
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-4660 v3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 4600H
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4660 v3 across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 35 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4660 v3, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
Xeon E5-4660 v3
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.4% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+337.5% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,167 vs 14,173).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
Ryzen 5 4600H
2020Xeon E5-4660 v3
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.4% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+337.5% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4660 v3 across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 35 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4660 v3, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,167 vs 14,173).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 4600H better than Xeon E5-4660 v3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 4600H | Xeon E5-4660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 4600H | Xeon E5-4660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 196 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 74 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 4600H | Xeon E5-4660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 269 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 4600H | Xeon E5-4660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 342 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 354 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 4600H and Xeon E5-4660 v3


Ryzen 5 4600H
Ryzen 5 4600H
The Ryzen 5 4600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,173 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-4660 v3
Xeon E5-4660 v3
The Xeon E5-4660 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,167 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 4600H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4660 v3 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-4660 v3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600H versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-4660 v3 — a 31.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 4600H (base: 3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 4600H uses the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4660 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 4600H scores 14,173 against the Xeon E5-4660 v3's 14,167 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen 5 4600H. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600H vs 35 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4660 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 4600H | Xeon E5-4660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 14 / 28+133% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+38% | 2.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+43% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 35 MB (total)+338% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 14,173 | 14,167 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 4600H uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4660 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 4600H | Xeon E5-4660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











