
Ryzen 5 4600H
Popular choices:

Xeon D-1732TE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 4600H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 52W, a 7W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,173 vs 14,254).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1732TE, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon D-1732TE
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 4600H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌15.6% higher power demand at 52W vs 45W.
Ryzen 5 4600H
2020Xeon D-1732TE
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 52W, a 7W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,173 vs 14,254).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1732TE, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 4600H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌15.6% higher power demand at 52W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon D-1732TE better than Ryzen 5 4600H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 4600H | Xeon D-1732TE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 4600H | Xeon D-1732TE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 196 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 63 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 4600H | Xeon D-1732TE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 344 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 220 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 4600H | Xeon D-1732TE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 342 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 305 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 4600H and Xeon D-1732TE


Ryzen 5 4600H
Ryzen 5 4600H
The Ryzen 5 4600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,173 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon D-1732TE
Xeon D-1732TE
The Xeon D-1732TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 52 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,254 points. Launch price was $730.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 4600H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-1732TE offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon D-1732TE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600H versus 3 GHz on the Xeon D-1732TE — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 4600H (base: 3 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Ryzen 5 4600H uses the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon D-1732TE uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 4600H scores 14,173 against the Xeon D-1732TE's 14,254 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon D-1732TE. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600H vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon D-1732TE.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 4600H | Xeon D-1732TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+33% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+58% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 15 MB (total)+88% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% |
| Process | 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 14,173 | 14,254 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 4600H uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1732TE uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 4600H | Xeon D-1732TE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | FCBGA2227 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











