Ryzen 5 3500X vs Xeon Silver 4114

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 5 3500X

6 Cores6 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2019

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon Silver 4114

10 Cores20 Thrd85 WWMax: 3 GHz2017

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Ryzen 5 3500X

6 / 6

13,165

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Silver 4114

10 / 20

13,097

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 3500X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+132.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 14 MB).
✅Costs $457 less on MSRP ($155 MSRP vs $612 MSRP).
✅Delivers 296.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.9 vs 21.4 PassMark/$ ($155 MSRP vs $612 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4114, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Silver 4114

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3500X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,097 vs 13,165).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (14 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.4 vs 84.9 PassMark/$ ($612 MSRP vs $155 MSRP).
❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.

Ryzen 5 3500X

2019

Xeon Silver 4114

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+132.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 14 MB).
✅Costs $457 less on MSRP ($155 MSRP vs $612 MSRP).
✅Delivers 296.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.9 vs 21.4 PassMark/$ ($155 MSRP vs $612 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4114, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3500X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,097 vs 13,165).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (14 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.4 vs 84.9 PassMark/$ ($612 MSRP vs $155 MSRP).
❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3500X better than Xeon Silver 4114?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Silver 4114 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3500X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 3500X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 28.2% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 3500X is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 132.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 14 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 3500X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 3500X is $457 cheaper on MSRP at $155 MSRP versus $612 MSRP, and it gives you a 28.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 296.9% better value on MSRP (84.9 vs 21.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 3500X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017), 132.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 14 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 6 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 3500X Benchmark Check

Xeon Silver 4114 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 3500X	Xeon Silver 4114
1080p
low	197 FPS	169 FPS
medium	159 FPS	134 FPS
high	133 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	87 FPS
1440p
low	154 FPS	138 FPS
medium	119 FPS	107 FPS
high	96 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	65 FPS
medium	58 FPS	54 FPS
high	46 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	34 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3500X Open Xeon Silver 4114

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 3500X	Xeon Silver 4114
1080p
low	329 FPS	124 FPS
medium	329 FPS	110 FPS
high	327 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	294 FPS	82 FPS
1440p
low	329 FPS	110 FPS
medium	329 FPS	100 FPS
high	298 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	263 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	286 FPS	91 FPS
medium	249 FPS	84 FPS
high	221 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	198 FPS	58 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3500X Open Xeon Silver 4114

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 3500X	Xeon Silver 4114
1080p
low	329 FPS	327 FPS
medium	329 FPS	327 FPS
high	329 FPS	327 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	327 FPS
1440p
low	329 FPS	327 FPS
medium	329 FPS	327 FPS
high	329 FPS	327 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	327 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	327 FPS
medium	243 FPS	327 FPS
high	204 FPS	322 FPS
ultra	160 FPS	262 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3500X Open Xeon Silver 4114

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 3500X	Xeon Silver 4114
1080p
low	329 FPS	327 FPS
medium	329 FPS	327 FPS
high	329 FPS	327 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	327 FPS
1440p
low	329 FPS	327 FPS
medium	329 FPS	327 FPS
high	329 FPS	327 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	327 FPS
4K
low	329 FPS	327 FPS
medium	329 FPS	327 FPS
high	329 FPS	327 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	327 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3500X Open Xeon Silver 4114

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3500X and Xeon Silver 4114

Ryzen 5 3500X

The Ryzen 5 3500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,165 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon Silver 4114

The Xeon Silver 4114 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB. L2 cache: 10 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,097 points. Launch price was $694.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3500X packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4114 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon Silver 4114 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3500X versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4114 — a 31% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3500X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3500X uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4114 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3500X scores 13,165 against the Xeon Silver 4114's 13,097 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 3500X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3500X vs 13.75 MB on the Xeon Silver 4114.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3500X	Xeon Silver 4114
Cores / Threads	6 / 6	10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+37%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+64%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+133%	13.75 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	10 MB+1900%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Matisse (2019−2020)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	13,165	13,097

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3500X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4114 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon Silver 4114 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 3500X) vs 6 (Xeon Silver 4114). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3500X) vs 48 (Xeon Silver 4114) — the Xeon Silver 4114 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series (Ryzen 5 3500X) and Intel C621 (Xeon Silver 4114).

Feature	Ryzen 5 3500X	Xeon Silver 4114
Socket	AM4	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	768 GB+500%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	48+100%

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 3500X launched at $155 MSRP, while the Xeon Silver 4114 debuted at $612. On MSRP ($155 vs $612), the Ryzen 5 3500X is $457 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3500X delivers 84.9 pts/$ vs 21.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Silver 4114 — making the Ryzen 5 3500X the 119.5% better value option.