
Ryzen 5 3500X
Popular choices:

Xeon D-1581
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+2033.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 1.5 MB).
- ✅Costs $245 less on MSRP ($155 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 157.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.9 vs 32.9 PassMark/$ ($155 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,165 vs 13,173).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1581, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Xeon D-1581
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3500X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.9 vs 84.9 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $155 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 3500X
2019Xeon D-1581
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+2033.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 1.5 MB).
- ✅Costs $245 less on MSRP ($155 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 157.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.9 vs 32.9 PassMark/$ ($155 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,165 vs 13,173).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1581, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3500X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.9 vs 84.9 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $155 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3500X better than Xeon D-1581?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3500X | Xeon D-1581 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3500X | Xeon D-1581 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3500X | Xeon D-1581 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3500X | Xeon D-1581 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 302 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3500X and Xeon D-1581


Ryzen 5 3500X
Ryzen 5 3500X
The Ryzen 5 3500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,165 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon D-1581
Xeon D-1581
The Xeon D-1581 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (per core). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 13,173 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3500X packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon D-1581 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon D-1581 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3500X versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon D-1581 — a 52.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3500X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3500X uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon D-1581 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3500X scores 13,165 against the Xeon D-1581's 13,173 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon D-1581. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3500X vs 1.5 MB (per core) on the Xeon D-1581.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3500X | Xeon D-1581 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+71% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+100% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+2033% | 1.5 MB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 13,165 | 13,173 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3500X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1581 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3500X | Xeon D-1581 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA1667 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 3500X launched at $155 MSRP, while the Xeon D-1581 debuted at $400. On MSRP ($155 vs $400), the Ryzen 5 3500X is $245 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3500X delivers 84.9 pts/$ vs 32.9 pts/$ for the Xeon D-1581 — making the Ryzen 5 3500X the 88.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3500X | Xeon D-1581 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $155-61% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.9+158% | 32.9 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












