
Ryzen 5 3500X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $174 less on MSRP ($155 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 24.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.9 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($155 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,165 vs 22,430).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +70.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 84.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $155 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 3500X
2019Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $174 less on MSRP ($155 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 24.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.9 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($155 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +70.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,165 vs 22,430).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 84.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $155 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen 5 3500X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3500X | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3500X | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 428 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 242 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3500X | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 275 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3500X | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 396 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3500X and Ryzen 7 3700X


Ryzen 5 3500X
Ryzen 5 3500X
The Ryzen 5 3500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,165 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3500X packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3500X versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3500X uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3500X scores 13,165 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 52.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3500X vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3500X | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz | 4.4 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 13,165 | 22,430+70% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series (Ryzen 5 3500X) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3500X | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 3500X launched at $155 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($155 vs $329), the Ryzen 5 3500X is $174 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3500X delivers 84.9 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 5 3500X the 21.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3500X | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $155-53% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.9+24% | 68.2 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












