Ryzen 5 3500U vs Xeon E5-2623 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 3500U

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Xeon E5-2623 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2623 v4 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,836 vs 6,868).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 10 MB).

Xeon E5-2623 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 3500U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 3500U

2019

Xeon E5-2623 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Xeon E5-2623 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2623 v4 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,836 vs 6,868).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 10 MB).

Trade-offs

❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 3500U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2623 v4 better than Ryzen 5 3500U?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2623 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3500U is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2623 v4 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 7.1% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2623 v4 is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2623 v4 still looks like the safer overall buy. Xeon E5-2623 v4 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 7.1% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 3500U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 3500U Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2623 v4 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 3500U	Xeon E5-2623 v4
1080p
low	169 FPS	154 FPS
medium	149 FPS	132 FPS
high	120 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	98 FPS	84 FPS
1440p
low	142 FPS	132 FPS
medium	121 FPS	111 FPS
high	95 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	69 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	61 FPS
medium	61 FPS	55 FPS
high	48 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	34 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3500U Open Xeon E5-2623 v4

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 3500U	Xeon E5-2623 v4
1080p
low	120 FPS	166 FPS
medium	105 FPS	145 FPS
high	97 FPS	137 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	143 FPS
medium	90 FPS	124 FPS
high	83 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	94 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	112 FPS
medium	69 FPS	99 FPS
high	56 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	42 FPS	55 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3500U Open Xeon E5-2623 v4

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 3500U	Xeon E5-2623 v4
1080p
low	171 FPS	172 FPS
medium	171 FPS	172 FPS
high	171 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	171 FPS	172 FPS
1440p
low	171 FPS	172 FPS
medium	171 FPS	172 FPS
high	171 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	171 FPS	172 FPS
4K
low	171 FPS	172 FPS
medium	171 FPS	172 FPS
high	171 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	171 FPS	172 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3500U Open Xeon E5-2623 v4

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 3500U	Xeon E5-2623 v4
1080p
low	171 FPS	172 FPS
medium	171 FPS	172 FPS
high	171 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	171 FPS	172 FPS
1440p
low	171 FPS	172 FPS
medium	171 FPS	172 FPS
high	171 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	171 FPS	172 FPS
4K
low	171 FPS	172 FPS
medium	171 FPS	172 FPS
high	171 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	171 FPS	172 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3500U Open Xeon E5-2623 v4

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3500U and Xeon E5-2623 v4

Ryzen 5 3500U

The Ryzen 5 3500U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,836 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2623 v4

The Xeon E5-2623 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 6,868 points. Launch price was $444.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 5 3500U and Xeon E5-2623 v4 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3500U versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2623 v4 — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3500U (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3500U uses the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2623 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3500U scores 6,836 against the Xeon E5-2623 v4's 6,868 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2623 v4. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3500U vs 10 MB on the Xeon E5-2623 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3500U	Xeon E5-2623 v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+16%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.6 GHz+24%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	10 MB+150%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB+100%
Process	12 nm-14%	14 nm
Architecture	Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	6,836	6,868
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,545	—
Geekbench 6 Single	876	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,898	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3500U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2623 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3500U	Xeon E5-2623 v4
Socket	FP5	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 3500U) / not specified (Xeon E5-2623 v4). The Ryzen 5 3500U includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Xeon E5-2623 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3500U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3500U rivals Core i5-10210U.