
Ryzen 5 3500U
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2430 v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3500U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 80W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Xeon E5-2430 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2430 v2 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,836 vs 6,859).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2430 v2, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
Xeon E5-2430 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌433.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 3500U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 3500U
2019Xeon E5-2430 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 80W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Xeon E5-2430 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2430 v2 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,836 vs 6,859).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2430 v2, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌433.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 3500U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2430 v2 better than Ryzen 5 3500U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3500U | Xeon E5-2430 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3500U | Xeon E5-2430 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 80 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3500U | Xeon E5-2430 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3500U | Xeon E5-2430 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3500U and Xeon E5-2430 v2


Ryzen 5 3500U
Ryzen 5 3500U
The Ryzen 5 3500U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,836 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2430 v2
Xeon E5-2430 v2
The Xeon E5-2430 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,859 points. Launch price was $311.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3500U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2430 v2 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2430 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3500U versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2430 v2 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3500U (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3500U uses the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2430 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3500U scores 6,836 against the Xeon E5-2430 v2's 6,859 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2430 v2. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3500U vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2430 v2.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3500U | Xeon E5-2430 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+23% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.5 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 15 MB (total)+275% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-45% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) | Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 6,836 | 6,859 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,545 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 876 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3500U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2430 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3500U | Xeon E5-2430 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | LGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 3500U) / not specified (Xeon E5-2430 v2). The Ryzen 5 3500U includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Xeon E5-2430 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3500U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3500U rivals Core i5-10210U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3500U | Xeon E5-2430 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 8 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












