
Ryzen 5 3500U
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2448L
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3500U
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 70W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Xeon E5-2448L needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2448L across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2448L, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon E5-2448L
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,774 vs 6,836).
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 3500U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 3500U
2019Xeon E5-2448L
2012Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 70W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Xeon E5-2448L needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2448L across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2448L, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,774 vs 6,836).
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 3500U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3500U better than Xeon E5-2448L?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3500U | Xeon E5-2448L |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3500U | Xeon E5-2448L |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3500U | Xeon E5-2448L |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3500U | Xeon E5-2448L |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3500U and Xeon E5-2448L


Ryzen 5 3500U
Ryzen 5 3500U
The Ryzen 5 3500U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,836 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2448L
Xeon E5-2448L
The Xeon E5-2448L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,774 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3500U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2448L offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2448L has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3500U versus 2.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2448L — a 55.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3500U (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3500U uses the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2448L uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3500U scores 6,836 against the Xeon E5-2448L's 6,774 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 3500U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3500U vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2448L.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3500U | Xeon E5-2448L |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+76% | 2.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz+17% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 20480 kB (total)+400% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-63% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) | Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) |
| PassMark | 6,836 | 6,774 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,545 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 876 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3500U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2448L uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3500U | Xeon E5-2448L |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | LGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 3500U) / not specified (Xeon E5-2448L). The Ryzen 5 3500U includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Xeon E5-2448L requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3500U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3500U rivals Core i5-10210U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3500U | Xeon E5-2448L |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 8 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












