Ryzen 5 3450U vs Xeon E7340

AMD

Ryzen 5 3450U

4 Cores8 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon E7340

80 WW2007

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 3450U

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 2W instead of 80W, a 78W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

Xeon E7340

2007

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (6,544 vs 6,550).
  • Launch MSRP is still $213 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 3450U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 3900% higher power demand at 80W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3450U better than Xeon E7340?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E7340 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3450U is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 3450U is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 3450U is the better fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 3450U is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E7340 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 5 3450U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E7340 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (30.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3450U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2007). That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 3450UXeon E7340
1080p
low164 FPS164 FPS
medium139 FPS131 FPS
high109 FPS105 FPS
ultra86 FPS82 FPS
1440p
low142 FPS137 FPS
medium112 FPS107 FPS
high87 FPS84 FPS
ultra69 FPS66 FPS
4K
low68 FPS65 FPS
medium57 FPS54 FPS
high45 FPS43 FPS
ultra35 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 3450UXeon E7340
1080p
low106 FPS164 FPS
medium92 FPS150 FPS
high85 FPS139 FPS
ultra66 FPS105 FPS
1440p
low92 FPS153 FPS
medium80 FPS131 FPS
high74 FPS121 FPS
ultra60 FPS95 FPS
4K
low69 FPS120 FPS
medium62 FPS106 FPS
high50 FPS83 FPS
ultra37 FPS60 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 3450UXeon E7340
1080p
low164 FPS164 FPS
medium164 FPS164 FPS
high164 FPS164 FPS
ultra164 FPS164 FPS
1440p
low164 FPS164 FPS
medium164 FPS164 FPS
high164 FPS164 FPS
ultra164 FPS164 FPS
4K
low164 FPS164 FPS
medium164 FPS164 FPS
high164 FPS164 FPS
ultra164 FPS164 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 3450UXeon E7340
1080p
low164 FPS164 FPS
medium164 FPS164 FPS
high164 FPS164 FPS
ultra164 FPS164 FPS
1440p
low164 FPS164 FPS
medium164 FPS164 FPS
high164 FPS164 FPS
ultra164 FPS164 FPS
4K
low164 FPS164 FPS
medium164 FPS164 FPS
high164 FPS164 FPS
ultra164 FPS164 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3450U and Xeon E7340

AMD

Ryzen 5 3450U

The Ryzen 5 3450U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,550 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E7340

The Xeon E7340 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 6,544 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3450U is built on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3450U scores 6,550 against the Xeon E7340's 6,544 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 3450U. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Ryzen 5 3450U vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E7340.

FeatureRyzen 5 3450UXeon E7340
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz+14%
L3 Cache
4 MB
8 MB L2 Cache+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
Process
12 nm-82%
65 nm
Architecture
Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
PassMark
6,550
6,544
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3450U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7340 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 3450UXeon E7340
Socket
FP5
PGA604
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0