Ryzen 5 3450U vs Xeon E5-4620

AMD

Ryzen 5 3450U

4 Cores8 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon E5-4620

8 Cores16 Thrd130 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2012

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 3450U

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 2W instead of 130W, a 128W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4620 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (6,550 vs 6,635).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4620, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon E5-4620

2012

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +300% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $2,141 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 3450U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 6400% higher power demand at 130W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4620 better than Ryzen 5 3450U?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-4620 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3450U is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-4620 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4620 is the better fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E5-4620 is the smarter buy today. Xeon E5-4620 is at an unclear MSRP at $2,141 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 6.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (3.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3450U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 3450UXeon E5-4620
1080p
low164 FPS156 FPS
medium139 FPS135 FPS
high109 FPS107 FPS
ultra86 FPS88 FPS
1440p
low142 FPS132 FPS
medium112 FPS111 FPS
high87 FPS86 FPS
ultra69 FPS71 FPS
4K
low68 FPS62 FPS
medium57 FPS56 FPS
high45 FPS43 FPS
ultra35 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 3450UXeon E5-4620
1080p
low106 FPS141 FPS
medium92 FPS126 FPS
high85 FPS115 FPS
ultra66 FPS92 FPS
1440p
low92 FPS125 FPS
medium80 FPS113 FPS
high74 FPS102 FPS
ultra60 FPS82 FPS
4K
low69 FPS91 FPS
medium62 FPS85 FPS
high50 FPS75 FPS
ultra37 FPS58 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 3450UXeon E5-4620
1080p
low164 FPS166 FPS
medium164 FPS166 FPS
high164 FPS166 FPS
ultra164 FPS166 FPS
1440p
low164 FPS166 FPS
medium164 FPS166 FPS
high164 FPS166 FPS
ultra164 FPS166 FPS
4K
low164 FPS166 FPS
medium164 FPS166 FPS
high164 FPS166 FPS
ultra164 FPS166 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 3450UXeon E5-4620
1080p
low164 FPS166 FPS
medium164 FPS166 FPS
high164 FPS166 FPS
ultra164 FPS166 FPS
1440p
low164 FPS166 FPS
medium164 FPS166 FPS
high164 FPS166 FPS
ultra164 FPS166 FPS
4K
low164 FPS166 FPS
medium164 FPS166 FPS
high164 FPS166 FPS
ultra164 FPS166 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3450U and Xeon E5-4620

AMD

Ryzen 5 3450U

The Ryzen 5 3450U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,550 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-4620

The Xeon E5-4620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,635 points. Launch price was $400.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3450U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4620 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-4620 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3450U versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4620 — a 29.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3450U (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3450U uses the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-4620 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3450U scores 6,550 against the Xeon E5-4620's 6,635 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E5-4620. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Ryzen 5 3450U vs 16384 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-4620.

FeatureRyzen 5 3450UXeon E5-4620
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+35%
2.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.2 GHz+5%
L3 Cache
4 MB
16384 kB (total)+300%
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
12 nm-63%
32 nm
Architecture
Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark
6,550
6,635+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3450U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4620 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 3450UXeon E5-4620
Socket
FP5
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0