
Ryzen 5 3450U
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-4620
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3450U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 130W, a 128W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4620 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,550 vs 6,635).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4620, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon E5-4620
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,141 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 3450U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌6400% higher power demand at 130W vs 2W.
Ryzen 5 3450U
2020Xeon E5-4620
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 130W, a 128W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4620 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,550 vs 6,635).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4620, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,141 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 3450U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌6400% higher power demand at 130W vs 2W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-4620 better than Ryzen 5 3450U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3450U | Xeon E5-4620 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3450U | Xeon E5-4620 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3450U | Xeon E5-4620 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3450U | Xeon E5-4620 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3450U and Xeon E5-4620


Ryzen 5 3450U
Ryzen 5 3450U
The Ryzen 5 3450U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,550 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-4620
Xeon E5-4620
The Xeon E5-4620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,635 points. Launch price was $400.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3450U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4620 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-4620 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3450U versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4620 — a 29.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3450U (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3450U uses the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-4620 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3450U scores 6,550 against the Xeon E5-4620's 6,635 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E5-4620. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Ryzen 5 3450U vs 16384 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-4620.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3450U | Xeon E5-4620 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+35% | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 16384 kB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-63% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 6,550 | 6,635+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3450U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4620 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3450U | Xeon E5-4620 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













