Ryzen 5 1400 vs Xeon E3-1285 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 1400

2017

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Costs $387 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $556 MSRP).
✅Delivers 228.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $556 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,731 vs 7,735).

Xeon E3-1285 v4

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 45.7 PassMark/$ ($556 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Ryzen 5 1400

2017

Xeon E3-1285 v4

2015

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Costs $387 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $556 MSRP).
✅Delivers 228.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $556 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,731 vs 7,735).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 45.7 PassMark/$ ($556 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1285 v4 better than Ryzen 5 1400?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E3-1285 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 1400 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1285 v4 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1285 v4 is the better fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1285 v4 is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Xeon E3-1285 v4 is 229.0% more expensive on MSRP at $556 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and it gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 1400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the smarter recommendation now. At roughly 7,731 PassMark with 4 cores and 8 threads, it only makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 1400 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 1400 Benchmark Check

Xeon E3-1285 v4 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 1400	Xeon E3-1285 v4
1080p
low	170 FPS	169 FPS
medium	148 FPS	141 FPS
high	119 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	141 FPS	145 FPS
medium	118 FPS	119 FPS
high	92 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	65 FPS	66 FPS
medium	58 FPS	58 FPS
high	45 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	36 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 1400 Open Xeon E3-1285 v4

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 1400	Xeon E3-1285 v4
1080p
low	168 FPS	193 FPS
medium	148 FPS	174 FPS
high	139 FPS	162 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	125 FPS
1440p
low	146 FPS	172 FPS
medium	129 FPS	151 FPS
high	120 FPS	139 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	114 FPS	135 FPS
medium	103 FPS	123 FPS
high	80 FPS	102 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	76 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 1400 Open Xeon E3-1285 v4

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 1400	Xeon E3-1285 v4
1080p
low	193 FPS	193 FPS
medium	193 FPS	193 FPS
high	193 FPS	193 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	193 FPS
1440p
low	193 FPS	193 FPS
medium	193 FPS	193 FPS
high	193 FPS	193 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	193 FPS
4K
low	193 FPS	193 FPS
medium	193 FPS	193 FPS
high	193 FPS	193 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	193 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 1400 Open Xeon E3-1285 v4

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 1400	Xeon E3-1285 v4
1080p
low	193 FPS	193 FPS
medium	193 FPS	193 FPS
high	193 FPS	193 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	193 FPS
1440p
low	193 FPS	193 FPS
medium	193 FPS	193 FPS
high	193 FPS	193 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	193 FPS
4K
low	193 FPS	193 FPS
medium	193 FPS	193 FPS
high	193 FPS	193 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	193 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 1400 Open Xeon E3-1285 v4

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 1400 and Xeon E3-1285 v4

Ryzen 5 1400

The Ryzen 5 1400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,731 points. Launch price was $169.

Xeon E3-1285 v4

The Xeon E3-1285 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,735 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 5 1400 and Xeon E3-1285 v4 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 1400 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1285 v4 — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1285 v4 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 1400 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1285 v4 uses Broadwell-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 1400 scores 7,731 against the Xeon E3-1285 v4's 7,735 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E3-1285 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 1400 vs 6 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1285 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 5 1400	Xeon E3-1285 v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.5 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+33%	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Broadwell-DT (2015)
PassMark	7,731	7,735

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 1400 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1285 v4 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 1400	Xeon E3-1285 v4
Socket	AM4	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	24	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 1400 launched at $169 MSRP, while the Xeon E3-1285 v4 debuted at $556. On MSRP ($169 vs $556), the Ryzen 5 1400 is $387 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 1400 delivers 45.7 pts/$ vs 13.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1285 v4 — making the Ryzen 5 1400 the 106.7% better value option.