
Ryzen 5 1400
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 1400
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 45.7 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.5 vs 45.7 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,677 vs 7,731).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
Ryzen 5 1400
2017Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.5 vs 45.7 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 45.7 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,677 vs 7,731).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE better than Ryzen 5 1400?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 1400 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 1400 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 1400 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 192 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 1400 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 1400 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE


Ryzen 5 1400
Ryzen 5 1400
The Ryzen 5 1400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,731 points. Launch price was $169.


Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,677 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 1400 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 1400 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 1400 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 1400 scores 7,731 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE's 7,677 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 1400. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 1400 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 1400 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+100% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| PassMark | 7,731 | 7,677 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 1400 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 1400 launched at $169 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE debuted at $149. On MSRP ($169 vs $149), the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 1400 delivers 45.7 pts/$ vs 51.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE the 11.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 1400 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $149-12% |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.7 | 51.5+13% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











