
Ryzen 5 1400
Popular choices:

Xeon E3-1270L v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 1400
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Costs $412 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $581 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 246.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $581 MSRP).
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Xeon E3-1270L v4
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,662 vs 7,731).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 45.7 PassMark/$ ($581 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 1400
2017Xeon E3-1270L v4
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Costs $412 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $581 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 246.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $581 MSRP).
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,662 vs 7,731).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 45.7 PassMark/$ ($581 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 1400 better than Xeon E3-1270L v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 1400 | Xeon E3-1270L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 1400 | Xeon E3-1270L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 61 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 1400 | Xeon E3-1270L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 192 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 1400 | Xeon E3-1270L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 1400 and Xeon E3-1270L v4


Ryzen 5 1400
Ryzen 5 1400
The Ryzen 5 1400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,731 points. Launch price was $169.

Xeon E3-1270L v4
Xeon E3-1270L v4
The Xeon E3-1270L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 7,662 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 1400 and Xeon E3-1270L v4 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 1400 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E3-1270L v4 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1270L v4 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 1400 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1270L v4 uses Broadwell-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 1400 scores 7,731 against the Xeon E3-1270L v4's 7,662 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 1400. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 1400 vs 6 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1270L v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 1400 | Xeon E3-1270L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+7% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+33% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Broadwell-DT (2015) |
| PassMark | 7,731 | 7,662 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,289 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 4,271 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 1400 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1270L v4 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen 5 1400 versus DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E3-1270L v4 — the Ryzen 5 1400 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 1400 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 1400) vs 16 (Xeon E3-1270L v4) — the Ryzen 5 1400 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 1400) and C226 (Xeon E3-1270L v4).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 1400 | Xeon E3-1270L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+33% | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+50% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 1400) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E3-1270L v4). Primary use case: Xeon E3-1270L v4 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon E3-1270L v4 rivals Core i7-4790T.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 1400 | Xeon E3-1270L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 1400 launched at $169 MSRP, while the Xeon E3-1270L v4 debuted at $581. On MSRP ($169 vs $581), the Ryzen 5 1400 is $412 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 1400 delivers 45.7 pts/$ vs 13.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1270L v4 — making the Ryzen 5 1400 the 110.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 1400 | Xeon E3-1270L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-71% | $581 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.7+246% | 13.2 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











