
Ryzen 5 1400
Popular choices:

Xeon D-1531
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 1400
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 1.5 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,888 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,057 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1127.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 3.7 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,057 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1531, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Xeon D-1531
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 1400 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,668 vs 7,731).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.7 vs 45.7 PassMark/$ ($2,057 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 1400
2017Xeon D-1531
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 1.5 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,888 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,057 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1127.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 3.7 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,057 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1531, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 1400 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,668 vs 7,731).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.7 vs 45.7 PassMark/$ ($2,057 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 1400 better than Xeon D-1531?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 1400 | Xeon D-1531 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 1400 | Xeon D-1531 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 45 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 1400 | Xeon D-1531 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 192 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 1400 | Xeon D-1531 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 1400 and Xeon D-1531


Ryzen 5 1400
Ryzen 5 1400
The Ryzen 5 1400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,731 points. Launch price was $169.

Xeon D-1531
Xeon D-1531
The Xeon D-1531 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (per core). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,668 points. Launch price was $348.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 1400 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon D-1531 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon D-1531 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 1400 versus 2.7 GHz on the Xeon D-1531 — a 23% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 1400 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 1400 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon D-1531 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 1400 scores 7,731 against the Xeon D-1531's 7,668 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 1400. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 1400 vs 1.5 MB (per core) on the Xeon D-1531.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 1400 | Xeon D-1531 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+26% | 2.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+45% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+433% | 1.5 MB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 7,731 | 7,668 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 1400 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1531 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 1400 | Xeon D-1531 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA1667 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 1400 launched at $169 MSRP, while the Xeon D-1531 debuted at $2057. On MSRP ($169 vs $2057), the Ryzen 5 1400 is $1888 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 1400 delivers 45.7 pts/$ vs 3.7 pts/$ for the Xeon D-1531 — making the Ryzen 5 1400 the 169.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 1400 | Xeon D-1531 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-92% | $2057 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.7+1135% | 3.7 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











