
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4215
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 11 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4215, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4215 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Silver 4215
2019Why buy it
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,728 vs 13,787).
- ❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
2021Xeon Silver 4215
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 11 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4215, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4215 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,728 vs 13,787).
- ❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G better than Xeon Silver 4215?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G | Xeon Silver 4215 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G | Xeon Silver 4215 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 96 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G | Xeon Silver 4215 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 336 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 287 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 250 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 258 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G | Xeon Silver 4215 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 343 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G and Xeon Silver 4215


Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
The Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 13,787 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon Silver 4215
Xeon Silver 4215
The Xeon Silver 4215 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,728 points. Launch price was $794.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4215 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Silver 4215 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4215 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G (base: 4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G uses the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4215 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G scores 13,787 against the Xeon Silver 4215's 13,728 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4215.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G | Xeon Silver 4215 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+20% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+60% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 11 MB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cezanne (2021−2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 13,787 | 13,728 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4215 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G | Xeon Silver 4215 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












