
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-1680 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1680 v4 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,787 vs 13,945).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1680 v4, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1680 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-1680 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
2021Xeon E5-1680 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1680 v4 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,787 vs 13,945).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1680 v4, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1680 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-1680 v4 better than Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 335 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 219 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 145 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 336 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 287 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 250 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 311 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 349 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G and Xeon E5-1680 v4


Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
The Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 13,787 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-1680 v4
Xeon E5-1680 v4
The Xeon E5-1680 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,945 points. Launch price was $1,723.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-1680 v4 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-1680 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-1680 v4 — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G (base: 4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G uses the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-1680 v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G scores 13,787 against the Xeon E5-1680 v4's 13,945 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E5-1680 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1680 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+5% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+18% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 20 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cezanne (2021−2025) | Broadwell-EP (2016) |
| PassMark | 13,787 | 13,945+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-1680 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












