
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,787 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G.
Trade-offs
- ❌32.7% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
2021Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,787 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Trade-offs
- ❌32.7% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 201 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 432 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 336 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 287 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 250 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 242 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 357 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G and Ryzen 5 3600


Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
The Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 13,787 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — identical boost frequencies (base: 4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G uses the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G scores 13,787 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 24.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+11% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 32 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Cezanne (2021−2025) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 13,787 | 17,685+28% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,295 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G) / Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
| Target Use | — | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G launched at $150 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3600 debuted at $199. On MSRP ($150 vs $199), the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G is $49 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G delivers 91.9 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G the 3.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-25% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 91.9+3% | 88.9 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












