
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4208
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 85W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,940 vs 11,040).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 11 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4208, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4208 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Silver 4208
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+175% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 35W.
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
2020Xeon Silver 4208
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 85W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+175% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,940 vs 11,040).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 11 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4208, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4208 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE better than Xeon Silver 4208?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE | Xeon Silver 4208 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE | Xeon Silver 4208 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE | Xeon Silver 4208 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 258 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE | Xeon Silver 4208 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE and Xeon Silver 4208


Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 10,940 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon Silver 4208
Xeon Silver 4208
The Xeon Silver 4208 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 11,040 points. Launch price was $417.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4208 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Silver 4208 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4208 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4208 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE scores 10,940 against the Xeon Silver 4208's 11,040 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Silver 4208. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4208.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE | Xeon Silver 4208 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+25% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+67% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 11 MB+175% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir (2020−2023) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 10,940 | 11,040 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4208 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE | Xeon Silver 4208 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1024 |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Silver 4208).
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE | Xeon Silver 4208 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











