
Ryzen 3 7330U
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-4650 v3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 7330U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,645 vs 10,838).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4650 v3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Xeon E5-4650 v3
2015Why buy it
- ✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 7330U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
Ryzen 3 7330U
2023Xeon E5-4650 v3
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,645 vs 10,838).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4650 v3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 7330U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 7330U better than Xeon E5-4650 v3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 7330U | Xeon E5-4650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 7330U | Xeon E5-4650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 71 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 7330U | Xeon E5-4650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 265 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 7330U | Xeon E5-4650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 266 FPS | 271 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 7330U and Xeon E5-4650 v3


Ryzen 3 7330U
Ryzen 3 7330U
The Ryzen 3 7330U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,645 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-4650 v3
Xeon E5-4650 v3
The Xeon E5-4650 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,838 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 7330U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4650 v3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-4650 v3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7330U versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4650 v3 — a 42.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 7330U (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 3 7330U uses the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4650 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 7330U scores 10,645 against the Xeon E5-4650 v3's 10,838 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon E5-4650 v3. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7330U vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4650 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 7330U | Xeon E5-4650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 12 / 24+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+54% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz+10% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+275% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 10,645 | 10,838+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 7330U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4650 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 7330U | Xeon E5-4650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











