
Ryzen 3 7330U
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-4620 v3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 7330U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4620 v3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
Xeon E5-4620 v3
2015Why buy it
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 7330U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,525 vs 10,645).
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
Ryzen 3 7330U
2023Xeon E5-4620 v3
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4620 v3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 7330U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,525 vs 10,645).
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 7330U better than Xeon E5-4620 v3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 7330U | Xeon E5-4620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 7330U | Xeon E5-4620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 71 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 7330U | Xeon E5-4620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 263 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 7330U | Xeon E5-4620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 7330U and Xeon E5-4620 v3


Ryzen 3 7330U
Ryzen 3 7330U
The Ryzen 3 7330U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,645 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-4620 v3
Xeon E5-4620 v3
The Xeon E5-4620 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,525 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 7330U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4620 v3 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-4620 v3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7330U versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4620 v3 — a 49.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 7330U (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 3 7330U uses the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4620 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 7330U scores 10,645 against the Xeon E5-4620 v3's 10,525 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen 3 7330U. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7330U vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4620 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 7330U | Xeon E5-4620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 10 / 20+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+65% | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz+15% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+213% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 10,645+1% | 10,525 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 7330U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4620 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 7330U | Xeon E5-4620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











