
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,600 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 169.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.8 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (264 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌42.5% higher power demand at 285W vs 200W.
- ❌16.1% longer card at 310mm vs 267mm.
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅4.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅24.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 264).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 285W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 310mm, a 43mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌200.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,399 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,600 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 169.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.8 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅4.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅24.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 264).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 285W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 310mm, a 43mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (264 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌42.5% higher power demand at 285W vs 200W.
- ❌16.1% longer card at 310mm vs 267mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌200.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,399 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell better than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER make more sense than RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 719 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 279 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 300 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 183 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 933 FPS | 925 FPS |
| medium | 752 FPS | 757 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 682 FPS |
| ultra | 576 FPS | 591 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 722 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 586 FPS |
| high | 501 FPS | 516 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 407 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 362 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 932 FPS |
| medium | 749 FPS | 858 FPS |
| high | 674 FPS | 752 FPS |
| ultra | 609 FPS | 688 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 587 FPS | 645 FPS |
| high | 517 FPS | 564 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 476 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 378 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2340 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 8448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 66 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,828 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35,431 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 31,828 versus the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell's 35,431 — the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell leads by 11.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 8,448 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 10,496 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Raw compute: 44.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 50.53 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 66 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 82 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) with 264 Tensor cores vs 328.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,828 | 35,431+11% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 8448 | 10496+24% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 44.1 TFLOPS | 50.53 TFLOPS+15% |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+8% | 2407 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 112+17% |
| TMUs | 264 | 328+24% |
| L1 Cache | 8.3 MB | 10.3 MB+24% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 64 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 66 | 82+24% |
| Tensor Cores | 264 | 328+24% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has 32 GB. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) — a 52.4% advantage for the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 64 MB (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+52% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 64 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (Dual) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen (Dual) | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER draws 285W versus the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell's 200W — a 35.1% difference. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 310mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 200W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 310mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 111.7 | 177.2+59% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched at $799 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell launched at $2399. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER costs 66.7% less ($1600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.8 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 14.8 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 168.9% better value. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-67% | $2399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.8+169% | 14.8 |
| Codename | AD103 | GB203 |
| Release | January 8 2024 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #10 | #6 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












