
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Popular choices:

L40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30,201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $31,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3687.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.8 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $31,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌16.1% longer card at 310mm vs 267mm.
L40
2022Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 310mm, a 43mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌3779.8% HIGHER MSRP$31,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($31,000 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024L40
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30,201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $31,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3687.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.8 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $31,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 310mm, a 43mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌16.1% longer card at 310mm vs 267mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌3779.8% HIGHER MSRP$31,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($31,000 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is L40 better than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER make more sense than L40?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 57 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 719 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 407 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 440 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 351 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 134 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 933 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 752 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 978 FPS |
| ultra | 576 FPS | 734 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 722 FPS | 970 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 880 FPS |
| high | 501 FPS | 734 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 550 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 569 FPS |
| medium | 407 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 367 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 962 FPS | 492 FPS |
| medium | 817 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 293 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 753 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 630 FPS | 311 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 483 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 509 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 438 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 341 FPS | 119 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and L40

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2340 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 8448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 66 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,828 points. Launch price was $799.

L40
L40
The L40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 2490 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 32,601 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 31,828 and the L40 reaches 32,601 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is built on Ada Lovelace while the L40 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 8,448 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 18,176 (L40). Raw compute: 44.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 90.52 TFLOPS (L40). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2490 MHz. Ray tracing: 66 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 142 (L40) with 264 Tensor cores vs 568.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,828 | 32,601+2% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 8448 | 18176+115% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 44.1 TFLOPS | 90.52 TFLOPS+105% |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+5% | 2490 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 192+100% |
| TMUs | 264 | 568+115% |
| L1 Cache | 8.3 MB | 17.8 MB+114% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 96 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 66 | 142+115% |
| Tensor Cores | 264 | 568+115% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The L40 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The L40 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the L40 has 48 GB. The L40 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 960 GB/s (L40) — a 42.9% advantage for the L40. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 96 MB (L40) — the L40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 48 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 960 GB/s+43% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 96 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 12.2 (L40). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (Dual) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs NVENC 8th Gen (L40). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (L40).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen (Dual) | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER draws 285W versus the L40's 300W — a 5.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 750W (L40). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 16-pin. Card length: 310mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W-5% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 750W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 16-pin |
| Length | 310mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 111.7+3% | 108.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched at $799 MSRP, while the L40 launched at $31000. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER costs 97.4% less ($30201 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.8 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 1.1 (L40) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 3518.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-97% | $31000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.8+3518% | 1.1 |
| Codename | AD103 | AD102 |
| Release | January 8 2024 | October 13 2022 |
| Ranking | #10 | #61 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












